All
research in this article is from the source : http://io9.com/5954898/humanity-never-had-a-missing-link-to-apes
and http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/03/100302131719.htm
The
sources from both articles believe that the term and whole idea of a “missing
link” between humans and apes is false. Humans never swung from tree branches
or walked on all fours like monkeys did or leap from trees to find a new home
to exist on ground. Over millions of years, the transition happened gradually
and “instead of believing our transition to walking as a ‘missing link’, it
would be more accurate to say the transition was a long chain, in which one
kind of life shaded into the other very gradually.” The fossil record of the
relations are discontinuous, so in the gaps between fossils are easy to fill
saying they are “missing links” even though it is false and impossible to
prove.
I
personally agree with these sources and their beliefs. First and foremost, like
every other human being it is very difficult to believe and even imagine seeing
ourselves as coming from apes and having similar mannerisms as them. The fossil
record for the time period of the apes is sparse and it is said to be
impossible that we will ever find a specific fossil to be the “missing link” so
I will not get my hopes about it or spend my life searching for or tracking it.
But it is interesting how we do have similarities and I was curious to find out
when exactly the transition took place.
The
main idea is that the term “missing link” is inaccurate because in fact there
are several missing links – not just one.
The first link is exactly what I am looking for. The second one doesn't explain the problem. It is actually an example of how the term is misused in popular science articles.
ReplyDelete